AdaCamp Montreal Reflections

These past few days I’ve been in Montreal at AdaCamp, an unconference dedicated increasing women’s participation in open technology and culture. It’s been fabulous and it’s amazing to be surrounded by so many incredible women.

General conference thoughts: this is the second tech conference I’ve been to, the other was Google I/O. They were different in pretty much every way, from the number of attendees (by orders of magnitude) to the structure of the sessions. AdaCamp had only a generally time-blocked schedule, all of the sessions were proposed and scheduled on the first day by the participants.

There were tons of interesting sessions proposed and I wasn’t able to attend all of them, but below I’ll detail some of the highlights for me.

The Meta-Conference
Some of what the Ada Initiative does is help create codes of conduct and anti-harassment policies for conferences. One of the topics of discussion was how conferences can be better and more inclusive. AdaCamp, for its part, did its best to model good practices, such as color-coded lanyards for attendees to indicate their preferences for appearing in photographs (photographs OK, ask before photographing, don’t photograph). We talked about things that could be better. Some of the topics that came up were:

  • Alcohol at conferences. (Over)consumption is often normalized and there aren’t often great options for people who prefer not to consume.
  • Better ticket pricing, especially those with accessible options for students and self-funded attendees
  • Conference attire and what that means for people who don’t want to wear jeans and a t-shirt
  • Bathrooms — lines, accessibility, and gender binary assumptions
  • Dealing with people behaving badly at conferences
  • Child care and lack thereof

Further resources:
Code of Conduct 101 + FAQ (Ashe Dryden)
Code of Conduct Evaluations (Geek Feminism wiki)
HOWTO Design a Code of Conduct for Your Community (Ada Initiative)

Women in Tech
So this was kind of the whole thing, so there was not really a specific session on it. Some of the topics I heard talked about:

  • Women leaving the field and why
  • Bad behavior and toxic work environments
  • Burnout, why it happens, and how to deal with it
  • Additional expectations that are placed on women in the workplace, such as emotional labor
  • The imposter syndrome, what it is, how to recognize it, and addressing it

Further resources:
Women in Tech and Empathy Work (Lauren Bacon)
How Our Engineering Environments are Killing Diversity (Kate Heddleston)
Reasons You Were Not Promoted that Are Totally Unrelated to Gender (McSweeney’s)
Imposter Syndrome Training (Ada Initiative)
Avoiding Burnout, and Other Essentials of Open Source Self-Care (Kathleen Danielson)

Linguistics
This one is, I imagine, more personal for me. I studied linguistics back in the day (it was my emphasis within my cognitive science major) and Gretchen McCulloch led an excellent session on linguistics which made me miss college. I’d also like to spend more time discussing the framing of language we use to discuss women in tech (see: the ubiquity of the word “girl”).

Further resources:
Lexicon Valley Blog (Slate)
Text of Gretchen’s Lightning Talk (All Things Linguistic)

Other tidbits

  • The Twitter hashtag, for all the things I missed.
  • Jessamyn Smith’s excellently-named open source menstrual tracker, Egg Timer.
  • Crowdfunding campaign for a fallen laptop.
  • Katherine Presner’s resources for preparing to speak at conferences.
  • There was a designated quiet room for sitting, reading, checking emails, napping, etc.
  • I got myself a review copy of Sky Croeser’s book, Global Justice and the Politics of Information, so keep your eyes peeled for a review of that.
  • Every session seemed to contain at least one person who was knitting. I dig it.
  • I’m super jealous of the people who went to the robotics session.
  • Kendra Albert led a great discussion on “legal stuff” during which I learned a lot I didn’t know about licenses.
Continue Reading

Math is a basic skill

As a Woman In Tech™, I catch wind of various stories about how the tech world is such a good/bad/mediocre place for women. This is the first of my posts that addresses the subject, but first I wish to offer a minor disclaimer. In discussions of the lack of women in STEM fields, people often cite a pipeline problem—that not enough women have the education to get into these fields in the first place. Others cite issues with attrition due to company culture, family status, or other issues. As a developer near the beginning of my career, I feel more equipped to talk about the pipeline problem than other issues, which is not a means of saying that I don’t think the other issues exist or are not important, only that I am not the best person to speak to them.

With that out of the way, I want to address an attitude that is not specific to women, but that I think affects women disproportionately in their primary and secondary education in math.

“Math just isn’t my thing.”
“I’ve never been good with numbers.”
“Math is too hard.”

I’m willing to guess that most of us have heard, or perhaps even said, something along the lines of the above statements at one point or another. How did the person to whom the statement was addressed respond? Perhaps with a shrug or a reassurance that they felt the same way. Now imagine the same interaction, but instead of math, the original statement is about reading or literacy. What is the reaction? I’m guessing it’s not a shrug.

This is not to say that math and literacy are not difficult things to master. Both can be challenging. Some people will find one more enjoyable than the other. However, while literacy is generally thought of as a pretty non-negotiable skill to acquire in the course of your education, math is not seen in the same way. With pushes to stop teaching algebra and the generally accepted attitude that math just “isn’t your thing,” people duck out of their math education before establishing the basic competencies necessary to go into STEM fields.

This excellent article goes over some pervasive misconceptions on the subject of math education, but basically, high school math education should be within everyone’s reach, and we, as students, parents, mentors, and teachers, should not so easily allow ourselves to abandon that goal. Math is hard, and it can be frustrating, and it doesn’t come naturally to a lot of people, but none of these are reasons to stop learning it. Just because something does not initially come easily to us does not mean it is outside of our ability to learn, and I feel that the aversion to failure can block us not only from career opportunities, but from meaningful learning experiences. (This sentiment, by the way, applies far beyond math education, but that is what we will continue to focus on here.) People coming into college without at least a knowledge of pre-calculus or preferably calculus itself, will be facing an uphill battle to enter majors and eventually careers in science, technology, engineering, and math. And with all the other challenges that women face in this regard, why let this be another one?

I mention this in the context of women in technology, since I’ve observed that women tend to be more likely to bow out of math education earlier, probably partly due to difficulty and not engaging with the material and partly due to other societal or gender related biases. So encourage the children in your life to keep pushing through math. Try to find material to engage their interests if their school curriculum isn’t (I’ll try and compile a post of links for resources, if you have any please post them in the comments).

Continue Reading